What principle was overturned in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo?

The correct choice, which identifies the principle overturned in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, is focused on Chevron deference. This principle is a legal doctrine that compels courts to defer to administrative agency interpretations of statutes that they enforce, provided that those interpretations are reasonable. In the case of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the court reconsidered its prior alignment with Chevron deference, marking a significant shift in how courts will engage with agency interpretations of the law in the future.

This decision reflects a broader questioning of the principles that shape the relationship between federal agencies and the judicial system, particularly in the context of regulatory authority. By overturning Chevron deference, this ruling suggests that courts may take a more active role in interpreting statutes instead of automatically deferring to agency interpretations, potentially altering the landscape of administrative law significantly.

Understanding this principle's critical role in shaping administrative power helps highlight why its reconsideration in this case is noteworthy and impactful in the legal field.