What requirement did the case Ramos v. Louisiana establish regarding criminal cases?

The case Ramos v. Louisiana established that in criminal cases, the jury's verdict must be unanimous. This ruling reinforced the principle that the conviction of a defendant in a criminal trial cannot happen without the unanimous agreement of all jurors. The requirement for a unanimous verdict is rooted in the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees the right to a fair trial, including the right to a jury that presents a collective and consistent conclusion. The Supreme Court's decision in this case emphasized the importance of unanimity in maintaining the integrity of jury trials, ensuring that all jurors must agree on the guilt or innocence of the accused. This ruling has significant implications for the legal process in states that previously permitted non-unanimous verdicts, aligning them more closely with the traditional standards of justice observed across the United States.